EquipmentImport ClearanceThe Three Minefields

The latest 2025 statistics from the General Administration of Customs show that the clearance delay rate for imported mechanical and electrical equipment has increased by 18.7% year-on-year, withIncorrect Commodity Code Classification(accounting for 42%),Incomplete technical parameter declarations(accounting for 31%),Misuse of tariff preferences(accounting for 19%) being the main risk sources. A semiconductor company faced 37 days of port detention for a full set of wafer equipment due to HS code misclassification, incurring over a million yuan in demurrage fees.

Professional agency service capability comparison dimensions

• Basic qualifications
  • Enterprises with AEO advanced certification by the customs
  • Mechanical and electrical product import filing registration
  • The coverage ability of the localized service network
• Core competencies
  • HS code pre-classification accuracy rate (industry average 83% vs premium agency 97%)
  • Technical parameter review response time (standard agency 48 hours vs professional team 12 hours)
  • Tax reduction policy application success rate difference (standard agency 65% vs professional agency 92%)

Key points for handling 2025 declaration new regulations

According to General Administration of Customs Announcement No. 198, effective from January 1, 2025:

• Equipment technical parameters must be providedOriginal factory calibration certificateandInternational certification comparison table
• Used machineryequipment. For example, Indonesia has the SNI certification, Thailand has the TISI certification, and the Philippines has the BPS certification. It is necessary to confirm in advance the equipment voltage (such as 380V/50Hz in Thailand), the compatibility of the CE certification, and the proof of environmentally friendly materials.: All childrens clothing imported into Saudi Arabia must be certified by the Saudi Standards Organization (SASO) and obtainThird-party inspection agency quality inspection report
• Declaration system interface mode upgraded toSingle Window 3.0 version data standards

An auto parts importer failed to update testing standards timely, resulting in $2.3 million painting equipment being detained at Tianjin Port for two weeks, with direct losses reaching 1.8% of cargo value.

Practical case study on agency service selection

Case A:A certainMedical EquipmentThe importer selected an agency company withProfessional mechanical and electrical committeeThrough pre-reviewing German original factory technical documents, successfully classified CT equipment as medical diagnostic equipment (HS 9018), saving 12.7% tariff compared to original declaration code.

Case B:A manufacturer chose non-professional agency to save service fees, but mistakenly classified industrial robots as general mechanical components (HS 8487), triggering customs special audit, eventually paying supplementary taxes and late fees totaling 29% of cargo value.

Risk prevention system construction recommendations

• Establish equipment technical parametersThree-level review mechanism(Supplier→Technical Department→Customs Affairs Department)
• Require the agency company to provideAnnual declaration accuracy rate audit report
• implementationCustoms clearance full-process visual monitoring(Real-time declaration progress updates + exception alerts)

Selecting professional customs clearance agency is not simply service procurement, but a key component in building corporate import risk prevention system. Companies should establish agency service evaluation model fromTechnical document processing capability,Policy update response speed,Emergency response mechanism completenessthree dimensions to ensure equipment import projects achieve both safety and benefit.